26-06-2015, 11:35 PM
I am not entirely convinced Andy sorry.
The proposed changes are a recipe for chaos. You are asking the membership of Chess Scotland to approve changes to the constitution when there are still many unanswered questions about for example the position changes and the descriptions of the new positions. You cannot expect the membership to endorse these changes without this information.
The election cycle is unacceptable because it states that the President or director cannot be challenged during their term of office. That is anti democratic. I am sure these changes are intended to discourage dissent
from the membership.
This meeting should be held only when all the relevant information is put in the public forum
The proposed changes are a recipe for chaos. You are asking the membership of Chess Scotland to approve changes to the constitution when there are still many unanswered questions about for example the position changes and the descriptions of the new positions. You cannot expect the membership to endorse these changes without this information.
The election cycle is unacceptable because it states that the President or director cannot be challenged during their term of office. That is anti democratic. I am sure these changes are intended to discourage dissent
from the membership.
This meeting should be held only when all the relevant information is put in the public forum