27-06-2015, 09:43 AM
Steve,
Lets look at the counter argument for that. 1 year is not enough for a Director to plan and execute the plan. 2 years are better.
AGMs are no longer about election of Directors (as they are going to be staggered) meaning there is more time to discuss matters brought up by members. Personally I think that is a major plus.
President for a 3 year term. No issues with that. If the President is no use, we have (and indeed always have had) the mechanisms for removal. Second term. Badly needed. I understand why Donald brought in the 3 year rule but it is too short for me.
Discourage dissent from the membership? Really, I can think of far better measures if this was the intention!
Lets look at the counter argument for that. 1 year is not enough for a Director to plan and execute the plan. 2 years are better.
AGMs are no longer about election of Directors (as they are going to be staggered) meaning there is more time to discuss matters brought up by members. Personally I think that is a major plus.
President for a 3 year term. No issues with that. If the President is no use, we have (and indeed always have had) the mechanisms for removal. Second term. Badly needed. I understand why Donald brought in the 3 year rule but it is too short for me.
Discourage dissent from the membership? Really, I can think of far better measures if this was the intention!
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"