Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Declining entries
#39
(11-09-2017, 01:36 PM)mclarke Wrote:
(11-09-2017, 12:05 PM)George Neave Wrote: I don't mean to criticise the good work that folks are doing with juniors. My point was intended to be more about what happens when you reach 18 and what's on offer in the adult game. In a healthy sport one expects to see promotion from junior to senior as offering more opportunity and not less. It's a point for debate really - nothing more.

Sorry George, I wasn't taking that part as criticism and I didn't mean to come over as defensive as I think I did - sorry about that. I guess my comment is more the part about CS and tournament organisers focusing on juniors - I just don't think that aligns with what those of us in junior circles think - many of us would think the opposite - that the top players are looked after, but the juniors aren't. Some irony there perhaps.

Having run junior tournaments for about two years now, our economics are a lot simpler than a full weekend congress - we can reallocate medals and trophies if we're short of entries or have too many. It must be difficult for adult events when the prize money adds a huge fixed cost to your event. One other thing that is very common in junior chess - is the use of a venue multiple times a season (we play out of the same venue 6 times a year) - so it offers a bit of predictability for our players in terms of travel and what the event is going to be like, and quite a bit of predictability for organisers too. SNCL, David and John's FIDE Blitz also have this element too them - I wonder if that model of reusing a venue multiple times a season is a way forward of driving entries upwards.

(12-09-2017, 02:00 PM)Andrew Greet Wrote:
(11-09-2017, 03:29 PM)David Clayton Wrote: Just a quick reply to explain why the Inverness Chess Congress restricts entries to U2200.

In order to hold a FIDE rated tournament within a 3 hour playing session, we have to restrict the entries to U2200. It is part of the FIDE Rate of Play Regulations.

We would have to go to 4hr playing sessions to allow above 2200 players to participate, which is impossible to fit in due to the time constraints of the venue.

The other Scottish Chess Tour events do not have this restriction.

I hope this explains why the Inverness Chess Congress operates this restriction.

Thanks for explaining David; I never knew 2200 was a cut-off point for time controls. It's unfortunate that the venue was unable to accommodate four-hour playing sessions, but if that's the situation then so be it. I'll keep an eye on the congress in future years and hopefully will be able to play at some point. (Ideally not because my rating has fallen below 2200 though!)

Alternatively, you could have dropped FIDE rating the event, had it CS rated only instead and open the event to all? I I an earlier post that 3 2200+ players entered in previously seasons That means ~ 3 players who played previously could not on this occasion. Personally I think finding a way to accommodate them should have taken priority over getting to rate the games. For me this is the key point.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Declining entries - by JMcNicoll - 10-06-2017, 10:34 PM
RE: Declining entries - by SBMannion - 12-06-2017, 10:17 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Craig Pritchett - 13-06-2017, 05:59 PM
RE: Declining entries - by WBuchanan - 14-06-2017, 12:43 AM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 22-06-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Patrick McGovern - 29-08-2017, 11:50 PM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 31-08-2017, 03:08 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Patrick McGovern - 31-08-2017, 04:17 PM
RE: Declining entries - by David Deary - 05-09-2017, 10:21 PM
RE: Declining entries - by PeterReidSmith - 31-08-2017, 05:13 PM
RE: Declining entries - by amuir - 01-09-2017, 11:43 AM
RE: Declining entries - by andyburnett - 02-09-2017, 03:59 PM
RE: Declining entries - by AndrewGreen - 02-09-2017, 06:11 PM
RE: Declining entries - by John Watkins - 02-09-2017, 10:20 PM
RE: Declining entries - by amuir - 02-09-2017, 09:07 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Adam Bremner - 02-09-2017, 11:59 PM
RE: Declining entries - by PeterReidSmith - 03-09-2017, 12:03 PM
RE: Declining entries - by AndrewGreen - 05-09-2017, 11:18 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Matthew Turner - 06-09-2017, 09:10 AM
RE: Declining entries - by amuir - 06-09-2017, 09:14 AM
RE: Declining entries - by Alex McFarlane - 06-09-2017, 10:10 AM
RE: Declining entries - by Andrew Greet - 06-09-2017, 01:38 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Jim Webster - 06-09-2017, 03:03 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Adam Bremner - 06-09-2017, 07:27 PM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 11-09-2017, 10:19 AM
RE: Declining entries - by Andrew Greet - 11-09-2017, 11:30 AM
RE: Declining entries - by mclarke - 11-09-2017, 11:54 AM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 11-09-2017, 12:05 PM
RE: Declining entries - by mclarke - 11-09-2017, 01:36 PM
RE: Declining entries - by David Clayton - 11-09-2017, 03:29 PM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 11-09-2017, 07:39 PM
RE: Declining entries - by JMcNicoll - 11-09-2017, 08:43 PM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 11-09-2017, 10:41 PM
RE: Declining entries - by JMcNicoll - 11-09-2017, 11:58 PM
RE: Declining entries - by andyburnett - 12-09-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: Declining entries - by Andrew Greet - 12-09-2017, 02:00 PM
RE: Declining entries - by George Neave - 13-09-2017, 08:56 AM
RE: Declining entries - by Andy Howie - 12-09-2017, 11:51 PM
RE: Declining entries - by Alex McFarlane - 13-09-2017, 06:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)