![]() |
Richardson & Spens results - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.chessscotland.com/forum) +-- Forum: Members Only (https://www.chessscotland.com/forum/forum-16.html) +--- Forum: Tournaments and Events (https://www.chessscotland.com/forum/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Richardson & Spens results (/thread-877.html) |
Re: Richardson & Spens results - hamish olson - 17-04-2014 Duncan Grassie Wrote:andyburnett Wrote:Out of interest, will the arbiters' reasoning for their decisions be made public? Not necessarily along with each arbiter's name (though I can't imagine why that should be a problem for them) but in the interests of transparency and open-ness. If we win I will definitely buy you a drink some time mate - for the entertainment factor if nothing else! Re: Richardson & Spens results - Phil Thomas - 17-04-2014 Not sure where I put Andy Muir's mail address but for everyone's information I will be turning up with the winners medals for the three competitions. There seems to be one for each board playing in the final plus 2 extras. I assume from Andy handing over these medals to me that he won't be present as a non playing captain. Re: Richardson & Spens results - andyburnett - 17-04-2014 hamish olson Wrote:andyburnett Wrote:Adam Bremner Wrote:I really hope that the decision is only made public after the final, as publically releasing the outcome of it would certainly help one of the teams prep. What exactly do you have too much class for Hamish? Not much by the sound of things! - I wasn't at the AGM for the same reason I didn't play 6 of our league fixtures - I work and can't always get back from Edinburgh in time. - Can't comment on the Alan Tate issue; I wasn't at the AGM and no-one has ever mentioned this previously to me, including yourself in conversations with me. - I seem to recall you posting in support of my argument in the week prior to the Hamilton match, with some very negative statements about Andy Muir and Hamilton included. It's still there, check it out. Perhaps it was you they were referring to at the AGM? -I gave you a heads-up about the eligibility of Jonathan Rowson or whoever so you could check things out before Saturday, so there wouldn't be a problem. If there is a problem, it's of your making. Gamesmanship? ![]() Re: Richardson & Spens results - Donald Wilson - 17-04-2014 I was planning to come along to the Finals on Saturday, to spectate and enjoy the big day. I'm having second thoughts now. Re: Richardson & Spens results - Phil Thomas - 17-04-2014 If those rules for remote play were ready. We could have the two Richardson teams in separate rooms. :ymdevil: Re: Richardson & Spens results - StevenTweedie - 17-04-2014 Looks to me like Andy B is trying his damnedest these days to get Dragons to replace Hamilton as the most hated team in Scotland! Something tells me that you've got a fair way to go though. I had heard chat from the BA boys that there was the potential for JR (not Redpath before Andy gets his knickers in any more of a twist) to play for them again in the Richardson this year, and even although it would have made the Semi harder than it (obviously!) was, I thought it was a fantastic idea. Scotland's best player playing in Scotlands Premier event for his resurgent, junior filled, team? Beautiful. Ultimately BA are his home club, I don't believe he has played for anyone in between, so what is the basis for this query? I honestly can't believe there is an issue of whether he's Bona Fide! As Hamish alluded to, if Mr Tate hasn't paid subscriptions over the last two years, then he's got just as much right as JR has to be playing (less if JR has paid subs...if you have paid subs Alan then I apologise - just going from the posts on here). Bears a striking resemblance to last years "cat amongst the pigeons" discussion prior to Dragons game vs. Hamilton if I'm being brutally honest where there was a threatened boycott over 10 rating points! Anyway, good luck to both teams for Saturday. Hopefully common sense prevails, this Bona Fide discussion is resolved promptly to allow all players to play, and it's a good, friendly final. Re: Richardson & Spens results - Hugh Brechin - 18-04-2014 Right, it's possible that our executive director will weigh in with something more authoritative on this, but just as a gentle suggestion: keep it a little more civilised, guys (Andy B, Hamish, this means both of you). This thread's in danger of descending into some not especially nice stuff. Let's stop the aggro here and move on. And someone get Bremner an inflatable sheep. Re: Richardson & Spens results - D-Oswald - 18-04-2014 Rowson Richardson Cup Rumourmill: Right, Rong, or Ridiculous? He was apparently playing in the Semis but that didn't happen... Are the BA boys at it again? Is team gaffer Hamish 'Jose Mourinho' Olson playing mindgames? Who will be the specialist in failure? What happens if Tate and Rowson play on board 1 and are both ineligible? Saturday is going to be interesting even before the f-pawns get moving... Re: Richardson & Spens results - robin moore - 18-04-2014 Who do folks fancy for the Campbell, Spens and Richardson? I think Troon will win the Campbell (sorry Crawford) The Spens looks too close to call I have a sneaky feeling Bon Accord may just edge the Richardson if they have.. ahem.. their best team out. Bon Accord may have a couple of of very strong players at each end of the team and although the Dragons look stronger on the middle boards, they will be up against some very aggressive young players. Re: Richardson & Spens results - Adam Bremner - 18-04-2014 Hugh Brechin Wrote:And someone get Bremner an inflatable sheep. I second this. They are seemingly much harder to find than I thought. If anyone has some spare, let me know. Plenty more ways to ramp up the party atmosphere though. It is amazing what £10 will buy you in poundland. :ymparty: |