Posts: 1,929
Threads: 263
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
5
Just witnessed one of *the* games of the tournament so far. Just have to share this with you
[pgn]1.e4 e5 2.Nf3[/pgn]
Draw agreed
Struggling a bit with the analysis. Can someone help?
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
Posts: 370
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2011
Too complex for me
Posts: 944
Threads: 127
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
4
white has the advantage in the position but is a disadvantage because he chose 1.e4 I thought the arbiters couldn't allow a quick draw
Posts: 232
Threads: 14
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
What's your take on this game from an anti-cheating perspective, Andy?
A draw may only be agreed during a game, not before. Otherwise it is match-fixing.
I suppose Black may reasonably have judged the position to be level after 2 moves.
But, hypothetically, if after say:
1. e3 a5 2. Qh5 Ra6 3. Qxa5,
Black does not take the Queen and the game is a stalemate in 10 moves, I would smell a rat.
I get my kicks above the waistline, sunshine