Poll: How should the Sensory Boards be funded
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
By Donation (individuals and congresses)
44.12%
15 44.12%
Increasing congress entry fees by £1 (going towards the costs)
23.53%
8 23.53%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £50
8.82%
3 8.82%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £75
2.94%
1 2.94%
Congresses using the boards paying an extra 5p per graded result
8.82%
3 8.82%
I do not think Chess Scotland should use such boards
11.76%
4 11.76%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sensory Boards
#35
Quote:The Junior Scottish Cup final (football) each season tends to have a better attendance than many SPL games in a season and there is a gulf in level as some would put it. It is also broadcast on the television. I guess the people who attend and watch that are just misguided?

That's a cup final. Hamilton v Kilmarnock is usually not. You are comparing things that are not the same. I'd wager Linlithgow Rose's average weekly gate doesn't compare so favourably with SPL crowds.

Quote:lso the use of the word lowly is offensive

Come on David, Joe was saying 'lowly-rated'. As in, they have low ratings. That's not an insult, that's a statement of fact. His posts can be a touch inflammatory sometimes, but I think he was fairly careful to be polite in this one.

I think you've sometimes got some points with the things you say, but you take it a bit far. Phrases like 'so-called best players' are just silly, and distract from your point. 2300s are better at chess than 1400s. Denying that's just daft.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 23 Guest(s)