31-08-2011, 11:12 PM
Phil, you mean as in they consider us Minor players as cannon fodder and as a result are enticed to enter?
I am sure anybody who looked at my game from the Scottish would have considered me a bunny, so there may be some scope here
I agree with Robin. The tail end of the tournament usually brings games with a bit more spice and pressure, and consequently more interest as players battle it out for their respective sections. These games are usually just as tense, no matter what section they are played in, regardless of the overall quality of the play. That tension can lead to some quality play, just as it can lead to blunders, and all the sections should be covered. It also might give you some insight into your potential opponent's repertoire, given that there are very few games recorded outwith the Open section in databases.
What is CS's ultimate strategy and goals for the boards? Knowing that will help.
I am sure anybody who looked at my game from the Scottish would have considered me a bunny, so there may be some scope here
I agree with Robin. The tail end of the tournament usually brings games with a bit more spice and pressure, and consequently more interest as players battle it out for their respective sections. These games are usually just as tense, no matter what section they are played in, regardless of the overall quality of the play. That tension can lead to some quality play, just as it can lead to blunders, and all the sections should be covered. It also might give you some insight into your potential opponent's repertoire, given that there are very few games recorded outwith the Open section in databases.
What is CS's ultimate strategy and goals for the boards? Knowing that will help.