13-08-2014, 03:11 PM
StevieHilton Wrote:Keith,
I have said time and time again in this thread , the word used is should not must I would urge you to read this again. This motion can be adapted to suit the local situation. It is only formalising what is already taking place
3. All chess venues must either be accessible to all, or an acceptable alternative
venue with full supervision shall be available to those who cannot access the
nominated venue.
This is the law of the land in any case so the word must has to be used in this case
The word "should" is used in your motion. But it's mixed in with lots of other statements that say either "shall" (which essentially means the same as "must"), or "must" itself. Read it Stevie. Even your own quote above where you suggest the language used is "should" actually quotes from the motion and I've highlighted the word "must" from point 3. This is what people mean with regard to clarity. Let's make the language consistently "should" througout, and then I'm sure these "guidelines" will have very little resistence.