19-08-2014, 07:01 PM
I really don't understand why David D. and John Mc. seem to have taken such 'offence' at those of us who don't agree with them, or have raised possible (even though some most unlikely) scenarios, or are looking for extra clarification on what the motion will actually mean in practice if passed.
Whether 150+ FIDE member states have passed the wording or not is not the relevant point; 'will it improve chess in Scotland?' is.
Whether 150+ FIDE member states have passed the wording or not is not the relevant point; 'will it improve chess in Scotland?' is.