25-08-2014, 10:42 PM
I was referring to your amendment. I will be voting it down as it's a distinct issue.
This motion is about treatment of disabled players and discrimination its not about pairings and refusing to play an opponent. You have latched onto one sentence of this motion to peddle your crusade. Its a no from me. If you propose a separate motion I will in all likelihood support it if it is robust and workable.
This motion is about treatment of disabled players and discrimination its not about pairings and refusing to play an opponent. You have latched onto one sentence of this motion to peddle your crusade. Its a no from me. If you propose a separate motion I will in all likelihood support it if it is robust and workable.
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!