Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Motion 1 (wording to go to Council)
#42
David Deary Wrote:I was referring to your amendment. I will be voting it down as it's a distinct issue.

This motion is about treatment of disabled players and discrimination its not about pairings and refusing to play an opponent. You have latched onto one sentence of this motion to peddle your crusade. Its a no from me. If you propose a separate motion I will in all likelihood support it if it is robust and workable.

I have latched onto this to extend the notion that no one can refuse to play a disabled player to apply this concept to all players.

I agree that this can be seen by you a crusade but such is the democratic process.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)