Motion 1 (wording to go to Council)

[Andrew McHarg]

I think I would be in favour of simply removing the "2. No one has the right to refuse to meet either a disabled player against whom he has been correctly paired or an able bodied player against whom they have been correctly paired" completely from the proposal. I agree with previous posters who point out this would be simpler if it read "No one has the right to refuse to meet a player against whom they have been correctly paired", but as David points out; the act of removing the specificity of the point in relation to disabled players makes it questionnable as to whether it should be included in this particular document in the first place. Perhaps a separate document should be created and agreed on the conduct of all players, where such a statement could be included? Or does such a document already exist?