14-07-2015, 10:13 AM
Mike Scott Wrote:Quote:You didn't answer the question. Who called the SGM?
Assuming it was the President and Executive Director, they allowed the CWP to decide on the date of the SGM, according to the Executive Director, rather than making the decision themselves in their executive positions, so it seems that they are unable to separate their roles.
Would it not make more sense for the meeting to be ran by someone independent of the CWP?
I am not sure I understand the significance of your question?
Whoever is running the meeting should be neutral in respect of the proposed constitution and proposed amendments and what gets adopted or not.
That is clearly not the case given:
- those running the meeting are on the CWP,
- the CWP decided on the date and time of the meeting, meaning those working or are on holiday can't attend.
- those who decided to give less than 24 hours between the publishing of the amendments and the deadline for proxies are on the CWP.
The CWP have already considered and rejected some of the proposals and therefore are not neutral on them, and will likely be arguing against them, whereas the likes of myself are unable to attend to argue for them.
It just seems to me that everything is being stacked one way and the whole thing is now been rushed.