20-07-2015, 05:10 PM
I’m glad a solution has been found that satisfies Craig in the circumstances. It still seems hasty to restructure the future tournament though, in order to ‘remove’ one error that was made but bricking in another anomaly.
Can the Senior 50 be called a ‘title’, if it’s not awarded to the highest player who was eligible? Maybe if they are just called the Senior 50 and the Senior 65 prizes…!?
Andy, it’s not bizarre discrimination to recognize that 65 is also higher than 50.
Now that the situation has been resolved for this year, why not revert to what was presumably intended - an overall senior prize for all 50+, and a 65+ prize - so that there is not a consolation prize for aged 50-64 when the Seniors winner is older.
Can the Senior 50 be called a ‘title’, if it’s not awarded to the highest player who was eligible? Maybe if they are just called the Senior 50 and the Senior 65 prizes…!?
Andy, it’s not bizarre discrimination to recognize that 65 is also higher than 50.
Now that the situation has been resolved for this year, why not revert to what was presumably intended - an overall senior prize for all 50+, and a 65+ prize - so that there is not a consolation prize for aged 50-64 when the Seniors winner is older.