Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New constitution
Just realised that we are talking about Section 16. I thought we were talking about section 5.

If this is the motion I think it was, if memory serves me correctly was it not suggested (by the chair?) that Dereks motion was not a proper motion, it was a list and only Walters could go through? The meeting voted on this and it was unanimous. I may have this mixed up with something else but that is my recollection.

Does this strike a chord Walter?
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)