25-07-2015, 11:04 AM
WBuchanan Wrote:However, on the eligibility section
1) A motion WAS introduced that was not on the agenda
2) Just prior, Derek’s proxies were apparently ignored (though Andy H may have known they were insufficient, he’ll clear that up for us I’m sure).
3) Responses to Derek’s queries have been contradictory; for example according to Jim proxies were not ignored and the minutes weren’t wrong - but the minutes refer to the meeting ‘agreeing unanimously’ that his suggestion should fail.
And nobody has seen fit to address this yet, possibly because my proxies were actually ignored?
I have to wonder who else's proxies were ignored.