Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New constitution
Walter,
Irrespective of whether I agree or disagree with your various opinions and demands, there is one inaccuracy which cannot be left unchallenged. Readers of this forum will recall that when I was invited to join the CWP it was me who declined. I refused to allow my name to go forward for possible election. At that time I reminded the President in a public statement at the AGM that I was reducing, not increasing, my CS involvement. I think we can safely say that whatever other mistakes I may have made I most certainly made the right decision there.

For any casual readers who may be wondering what on earth is going on here with the endless succession of posts, can I please assure you that for my part there is no personal animosity towards Walter. In fact, I don’t recall us ever having spoken to one another before or after the recent SGM.

If the meeting in August decides to amend my suggested minutes of 14 July, that is routine, fair and reasonable. On the other hand, I lose interest when a conspiracy theory is launched into the forum especially in relation to the constitution review, a topic about which I can summon no more than a passing interest.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)