27-07-2015, 05:06 PM
robin moore Wrote:Andy Muir,
Proposals 2 and 5 are already part of the ChessScotland constitution.
Proposal 3- Matt has made his position clear on being considered for selection on numerous occasions.
Proposal 4- Are you suggesting there should not be a selection committee?
Proposal 6 is totally impractical.
Proposal 7- What training? Are ChessScotland funding it?
Robin , constitution was rejected.
Although Matt made his position clear, CS have not.
The selection committee & selections should be made by ID not overseer.
It is not impractical to move Scottish.
CS pay thousands of pounds each year into junior training.
Anyway if these are not seconded I am happy for Jacob to win the Scottish, incompetent directors not turning up for meetings, selections made by overseer and Glorney team never to win.
Can someone second these please ?