AGM proposals

[Derek Howie]

Let me draw attention to the post by Gerald Lobley of 28 July (Page 37) and in particular these excerpts:

“A number of these problems arise from the lack of understanding by certain CS members on how General Meetings are properly conducted”

“ALL votes were registered and recorded.”

“All the above is proper procedure and although it can look a little unwieldy at times it does prevent major problems and avoids anomalies. Although this SGM was a CS meeting it must be firmly stated that none of the CWP would have allowed a non-constitutional approach as that would have been against the whole principles we have sought to enshrine in our suggested changes.”

I see no reason to query any of Gerald’s observations above. They can all be accepted as “gospel”.

Point 1 - so who was Gerald referring to as I didn't have a clue?

Point 2 - contradicted by W\alter Buchanan's post of 28th July.

Point 3 - contradicts Jim Webster's post of 7 July.

I don't believe that they can all be taken as "gospel" given the apparent contradictions.