Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AGM proposals
#95
Douglas Bryson Wrote:The logic of why asking do you need to be a CS member to get a SCO code is as follows.

Walter lists various proposals on eligibility. The text states, "These principal requirements shall be built into ..... future Operating Procedures that relate to eligibility and the allocation of future FIDE ‘SCO’ registration codes"

I am not clear which parts of the text relating to eligibility requirements are to be built into the code creation requirements. If the part of the text in the preamble ie, "a person must be a member of Chess Scotland" is part of the "principal requirements" as per this proposal then this will lead to follow up questions on the practicalities of the proposal. However first we need to establish if CS membership is intended as a requirement for a SCO code to be allocated.

Sorry we cross posted – I think I have answered that in my last post.

I think you are looking at it the wrong way round. If it is 'impractical' to apply eligibility criteria set by the membership (and not in any great detail either so it shouldn't be a huge headache) because of admin requirements then doesn't that mean there must be something wrong with the admin!?

Cheers
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)