19-07-2016, 12:27 PM
Tate, Burnett and Shreeves I would think can be considered norm-seekers.
I agree that those mentioned by Matt are among the ones needing support to progress but if the Scottish didn't provide the chance for them to see an array of titled players and hopefully think they could emulate that achievement then, regrettably, no other event in Scotland does.
The benefactor provided funds for that very reason. It should not be forgotten that we had four really strong events because of that generosity. I feel I owe it to that person to try to continue providing events of that quality.
Matt's comments lead to the real question. "How do we progress chess in Scotland?"
The current Directors seem to have good ideas on this but without the finances plans are in jeopardy. There was considerable brainstorming during the event and some ideas are now on the table for discussion.
I agree that those mentioned by Matt are among the ones needing support to progress but if the Scottish didn't provide the chance for them to see an array of titled players and hopefully think they could emulate that achievement then, regrettably, no other event in Scotland does.
The benefactor provided funds for that very reason. It should not be forgotten that we had four really strong events because of that generosity. I feel I owe it to that person to try to continue providing events of that quality.
Matt's comments lead to the real question. "How do we progress chess in Scotland?"
The current Directors seem to have good ideas on this but without the finances plans are in jeopardy. There was considerable brainstorming during the event and some ideas are now on the table for discussion.