Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richardson & Spens
#39
Ianbrownlee Wrote:The problem with that comment is that the Richardson and other CS events are just that CS events, therefore changes have to be via the CS membership which is represented best by the AGM.

OK, but my comment says it isn't the only place you can have discussion. I also further say that if it needs to be formally implemented at an AGM then fine. My point is get discussion in advance, get reccomendations, then pass or reject it formally at an AGM if needs be. Leaving the majority of the discussion to the AGM is clearly not the best solution.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)