20-08-2017, 06:28 PM
(20-08-2017, 05:50 PM)StevieHilton Wrote: Andy,
My first sentence is not flawed, because the proposer and seconder did hold positions within CS.
They are members of course but officials.
I still think the decision is wrong for the reasons I outlined and will continue to speak out against.
AGM is sovereign and always will be?? Then why are post that are meant to be filled left unfilled
The AGM could have filled them.
No nominations within the prescribed time limit. Under the new Standing Orders and Constitution, any unfilled posts are passed on to the Management Board to fill. Has been like this for 2 (or 3) AGMs now so nothing new.
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"