AGM today (Consequences for noticeboard)

[Andy Howie]

Douglas,
Thank you for your further information with regards motion 4.
The problem is if they speak or propose motions as officials,
Then it would have to be discussed at board level.
only motion 6 seemed to be a  membership motion
The others from members who hold positions within CS.

Officials have the perfect to put forward motions, I have never
denied that but it must be made clear they are speaking as individuals or officials

Steve, 

I would expect that.  The people in positions can see the changes that are needed to improve things a bit easier as they are the ones that are active in those areas (Hamish for example with the changing the arrears date which affects PVG). The title on the Agenda was Motions from Members.  Going forward I think I will adopt Dougie's suggestion.  If anything it will show what I am saying, Board and Exec motions are very much the exception not the norm.