Poll: How should the Sensory Boards be funded
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
By Donation (individuals and congresses)
44.12%
15 44.12%
Increasing congress entry fees by £1 (going towards the costs)
23.53%
8 23.53%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £50
8.82%
3 8.82%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £75
2.94%
1 2.94%
Congresses using the boards paying an extra 5p per graded result
8.82%
3 8.82%
I do not think Chess Scotland should use such boards
11.76%
4 11.76%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sensory Boards
#62
Andie, I can't really be bothered getting into one of these "you said that"; "no I didnae" ; "aye, ye did" thingies. However, I really don't get why you've put up that post.


What "argument" am I putting forward that implies not "upgrading"?


I said the following:
"Nobody could object to the idea of Chess Scotland having sensory boards. In itself, it could only be a positive development."

I also said:
"If however, the money to fund this is money that could have been spent on other things, then that's maybe a different matter."
"Better things" could mean anything, including buying more digital clocks.

The second part of my last post seemed more worthy of a response, I'd have thought
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)