07-03-2012, 04:13 PM
First, Steve is indeed right that there are now two directors on the SC – I hadn’t picked up on Donald’s relatively recent position.
Second, the minutes of the 2009 AGM may be read by anyone who wishes; it’s better to read them than speculate on what they might say. On numbers, the minutes state that there were 40 but give 41 names – a large attendance, anyway. The meeting was far too long (5h30m) so it’s hardly surprising that full counts were not taken on every vote. The SC proposal was agreed in outline at the March 2009 Council and the document was available from May.
Regarding audits, etc, I can’t give detail on this as I’ve not been closely involved; Mac McKenzie and Steve Mannion would know the details. A grant application is a tedious process for Mac as the forms (to which I have on occasion contributed) ask for a great amount of detail.
Second, the minutes of the 2009 AGM may be read by anyone who wishes; it’s better to read them than speculate on what they might say. On numbers, the minutes state that there were 40 but give 41 names – a large attendance, anyway. The meeting was far too long (5h30m) so it’s hardly surprising that full counts were not taken on every vote. The SC proposal was agreed in outline at the March 2009 Council and the document was available from May.
Regarding audits, etc, I can’t give detail on this as I’ve not been closely involved; Mac McKenzie and Steve Mannion would know the details. A grant application is a tedious process for Mac as the forms (to which I have on occasion contributed) ask for a great amount of detail.