The thing is Andy, you are commenting ON the deleted post - you are telling me and the world (OK, that's a slight exaggeration of the level of world interest) what you think it means, when I'm saying it didn't mean that.
If you can make these comments (which are technically adverse, given the complaint), then the post or at least the little piece in question should be visible too.; otherwise it's prejudicial to any investigation of the complaint.
I see your comment linking me to making a personal go at Jim Webster was an edit, made eight hours after your original comment (which praised my posts), and after the formal complaint went in.
So - have you even seen the whole post?
The context is relevant . The piece in question wasn't actually personal at all. None of it was.
Cheers
If you can make these comments (which are technically adverse, given the complaint), then the post or at least the little piece in question should be visible too.; otherwise it's prejudicial to any investigation of the complaint.
I see your comment linking me to making a personal go at Jim Webster was an edit, made eight hours after your original comment (which praised my posts), and after the formal complaint went in.
So - have you even seen the whole post?
The context is relevant . The piece in question wasn't actually personal at all. None of it was.
Cheers