Scottish Championship

[Ianbrownlee]

Indeed you would expect the proposer not only to make sure of their seconder(s) but to provide the evidence on demand if the named seconder was not attending. Whilst there are 2 seconders named I would question the stance that it's all right, we still have one.

Would not the position be that if 2 seconders are named both have to legal, as it were, for the motion to be competent.

It's OK John as long as we have one valid seconder so the passed motion stands. It's on the onus of the provider to provide a seconder with no need to check on the seconder. If the proposer listed a seconder without the seconder's consent then that is a separate issue