01-04-2012, 06:57 PM
Hugh Brechin Wrote:Alan Jelfs Wrote:George Thomson Wrote:Very appropriate date for Mr Tweedie and Mr Redpath to play such a game :\ :\
I trust the arbiter awarded this game as 0-0.
Well, unless they both entered unexpectedly on the final day it actually happened a few years ago. But I've always thought that that game doesn't necessarily imply a prearranged draw - the argument being that both players know that backwards, know that the other one knows it, and that 1.c4 (though was it not actually 1.c3?) is tantamount to a draw offer that was accepted by 1...h5.
Plus, it's a pretty cool game. Optically neat.
A nice addition on April 1st, to add some nostalgia. I like the premise that 1.c3 is equivalent to a draw offer and h5 is the acceptance. Basically, would you rather see 7 moves of theory to a dry position, or something funky like that? A nice bit of chess humour.