Poll: Should non-anonymous posters be allowed usernames which are not their full names?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
44.00%
11 44.00%
No
56.00%
14 56.00%
Total 25 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Username Discussion
#45
Donald Wilson Wrote:At the risk of being tagged a wishy-washy liberal, can I suggest a compromise?

We could allow Chess Scotland members to post under initials or pseudonyms, but require non-members to post under a usual form of their name.

The right to post initially or pseudonymically then becomes a benefit of membership. It may not be enough to persuade many non-members to join CS, but it's a small safeguard against misuse of the noticeboard.

I don't think there is anything wishy-washy about being a liberal...but I suspect you knew that.

I thought this was a good idea when I saw it last night. I'm not sure it is entirely appropriate, but the phrase that came to mind was "iacta alea est".

Thank you for your, and others', support.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)