15-09-2012, 12:37 PM
It seems strange that policy can't be discussed on the forum. What particular elements of it can't be publicly disclosed to CS members? Is any of it a secret?
Sorry Andy and Robin, but the excuse that questions can't be answered just because one thread in the past went awry is not that great. Surely the moderators can prevent that happening again?
Given the AGM only takes place once a year and has a poor attendance, the forum should be the place where the CS directors should be able to explain policy to members.
if basic questions can be answered to a non-member by email then surely the same information can be posted on here so that members can see it as well?
This is more a general point of principle rather than referring to this specific thread, but in general I believe all CS directors should be explaining policy on here if asked.
Sorry Andy and Robin, but the excuse that questions can't be answered just because one thread in the past went awry is not that great. Surely the moderators can prevent that happening again?
Given the AGM only takes place once a year and has a poor attendance, the forum should be the place where the CS directors should be able to explain policy to members.
if basic questions can be answered to a non-member by email then surely the same information can be posted on here so that members can see it as well?
This is more a general point of principle rather than referring to this specific thread, but in general I believe all CS directors should be explaining policy on here if asked.