13-01-2013, 12:38 PM
I did a quick and "dirty" analysis of the game above. The missing data is how long the player took between moves. This really is essential as there is quite a swing between some of the moves as you move through the ply. I took these to 20 ply. First column is the move, second is where the choice was in the computer eval. Third is difference from the second move if it was the first, or the difference from the first move if not the first move.
move Diff from next Diff from 1
11 1 0.12
12 1 0.11
13 2 0.01
14 2 0.01
15 1 0.4
16 2 0.37
17 1 0.21
18 2 0.01
19 1 1.34
20 1 0.31
21 1 0.86
22 1 0.65
23 1 0.51
24 1 0.61
25 1 2.59
26 1 1.36
27 1 0.91
28 1 0.47
29 1 10.05
30 1 0.79
31 1 8.23
32 1 11.6
Here is a counter proposal for you based on this game alone. Is it not within the realms of possibility that his opponent did not play well. There are 5 moves here that appear to be computational blunders.
I am not for one second saying he did not cheat, however most people's idea of checking the computer to see if the computer selects the move is to run the game and see if it appears as the first move at any point. Anyone with the computer experience he has would know that you have to throw in some lower level moves where the count is a lot lower (quite a few of the earlier moves had 6 or 7 close choices) to throw off suspicion if you are actually wanting to cheat. Catching that type of behavior is hard but it is possible
move Diff from next Diff from 1
11 1 0.12
12 1 0.11
13 2 0.01
14 2 0.01
15 1 0.4
16 2 0.37
17 1 0.21
18 2 0.01
19 1 1.34
20 1 0.31
21 1 0.86
22 1 0.65
23 1 0.51
24 1 0.61
25 1 2.59
26 1 1.36
27 1 0.91
28 1 0.47
29 1 10.05
30 1 0.79
31 1 8.23
32 1 11.6
Here is a counter proposal for you based on this game alone. Is it not within the realms of possibility that his opponent did not play well. There are 5 moves here that appear to be computational blunders.
I am not for one second saying he did not cheat, however most people's idea of checking the computer to see if the computer selects the move is to run the game and see if it appears as the first move at any point. Anyone with the computer experience he has would know that you have to throw in some lower level moves where the count is a lot lower (quite a few of the earlier moves had 6 or 7 close choices) to throw off suspicion if you are actually wanting to cheat. Catching that type of behavior is hard but it is possible
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"