21-01-2013, 01:19 PM
I have still to hear anyone agree or disagree with my point that rules should put parity between teams higher than flexibility within teams. This is a fundamental question - anyone seeking to change or introduce rules really ought to have an answer or at least a viewpoint on this.
Should Andy Muir's domestic arrangements be of any interest to this discussion? We all have personal lives which impinge on our chess and Andy apparently
Just noticed Calum's comment while writing this. I would be happy enough with this compromise (although it obviously still isn't a completely fair rule).
Should Andy Muir's domestic arrangements be of any interest to this discussion? We all have personal lives which impinge on our chess and Andy apparently
Quote:prepared for Burnett/Bathie/Cocuzzoso it can't have been that much of an issue!?
Just noticed Calum's comment while writing this. I would be happy enough with this compromise (although it obviously still isn't a completely fair rule).