11-02-2013, 01:17 AM
The now non-existent link had been available for the entire lifetime of this particular web-site.
During that time not one person complained about the link, not one, and this is over a period of at least eighteen months. I also seem to recall that it was present on the previous incarnation of the site.
I have read various articles there over the years, but have never encountered anything I would consider 'beyond the pale'. That is not to say that such material does not exist however.
Surely it would have been enough to declare, as many sites do, that no responsibility is accepted for the content of external sites?
Considering how easy it is to encounter much more offensive material, I am surprised at how prudish the site is becoming. e.g. do not try to access perhaps the first site that would come to mind if researching U.S. President's.
During that time not one person complained about the link, not one, and this is over a period of at least eighteen months. I also seem to recall that it was present on the previous incarnation of the site.
I have read various articles there over the years, but have never encountered anything I would consider 'beyond the pale'. That is not to say that such material does not exist however.
Surely it would have been enough to declare, as many sites do, that no responsibility is accepted for the content of external sites?
Considering how easy it is to encounter much more offensive material, I am surprised at how prudish the site is becoming. e.g. do not try to access perhaps the first site that would come to mind if researching U.S. President's.