17-08-2013, 12:01 PM
Hi Guys
:\ I hear what you're saying but there underneath all the potshots there are genuine people not happy with the current state of affairs and I believe the standards committe have dealt with only one case. I'm new to all this but something fundamental is not right and until that's fixed it will continue. Instead of blaming guys on all sides and pinning hopes on the younger generation I would personally like to see mediation ( and knocking heads together) as a means of going forward. Using superlatives by some individuals wont help either. irnically for a forum , it may well be a case of increased communication and transparancy which may be part of the solution. I have spoken to members (and non members) and gathered several distinct insights but a similar ing through (amongst others) is a perceived lack of accountability to Chess Scotland AGM by the standards comittee. Again as I'm new to this I'm loathe to comment on this but I'm sure the AGM will have a lot to say on this :\
:\ I hear what you're saying but there underneath all the potshots there are genuine people not happy with the current state of affairs and I believe the standards committe have dealt with only one case. I'm new to all this but something fundamental is not right and until that's fixed it will continue. Instead of blaming guys on all sides and pinning hopes on the younger generation I would personally like to see mediation ( and knocking heads together) as a means of going forward. Using superlatives by some individuals wont help either. irnically for a forum , it may well be a case of increased communication and transparancy which may be part of the solution. I have spoken to members (and non members) and gathered several distinct insights but a similar ing through (amongst others) is a perceived lack of accountability to Chess Scotland AGM by the standards comittee. Again as I'm new to this I'm loathe to comment on this but I'm sure the AGM will have a lot to say on this :\