18-08-2013, 09:46 AM
Robert,
What purpose would be served by a public debate of the incident?
The vast majority of those that would be involved in it would have no first hand knowledge of the incident and would most likely be basing their comments on a partial set of 'facts' that they have been told by others and simply would not be qualified to speak.
Are you really suggesting a public lynching?
We must surely be able to trust the independence and competency of the SC and if there is real evidence to indicate that we can not - or at least not in this case - then I would agree that some mechanism to have it considered and action taken.
If you want an independent and unbiased SC you can not have the AGM - or an office bearer - instructing it what to investigate.
What purpose would be served by a public debate of the incident?
The vast majority of those that would be involved in it would have no first hand knowledge of the incident and would most likely be basing their comments on a partial set of 'facts' that they have been told by others and simply would not be qualified to speak.
Are you really suggesting a public lynching?
We must surely be able to trust the independence and competency of the SC and if there is real evidence to indicate that we can not - or at least not in this case - then I would agree that some mechanism to have it considered and action taken.
If you want an independent and unbiased SC you can not have the AGM - or an office bearer - instructing it what to investigate.