25-08-2013, 05:27 PM
Hugh,
As I have said beforehand, I do accept the result. However, I do have the right to ask question how the vote was obtained as well as the instructions if any on the use of the votes.
You have to admit that I was treated rather badly by the meeting in 2009. I had justification for my behaviour.
Yes I can criticise if officials are using cs databases to canvas on behalf of one candidate, without giving the same opportunity to the opposition.
Look at the minutes of the 2009 meeting. There were more votes cast in the second vote than in the first. Also, I was denied the opportunity by the executive director to withdraw from the vote. Yet you criticse my behaviour
I do agree with you on one point. We do have to listen to each other, but I remain unconvinced that CS will listen.
I will give credit when cs does something well but will criticise when something is wrong
Andy Muir,
John Dempsey was executive director in 2009
As I have said beforehand, I do accept the result. However, I do have the right to ask question how the vote was obtained as well as the instructions if any on the use of the votes.
You have to admit that I was treated rather badly by the meeting in 2009. I had justification for my behaviour.
Yes I can criticise if officials are using cs databases to canvas on behalf of one candidate, without giving the same opportunity to the opposition.
Look at the minutes of the 2009 meeting. There were more votes cast in the second vote than in the first. Also, I was denied the opportunity by the executive director to withdraw from the vote. Yet you criticse my behaviour
I do agree with you on one point. We do have to listen to each other, but I remain unconvinced that CS will listen.
I will give credit when cs does something well but will criticise when something is wrong
Andy Muir,
John Dempsey was executive director in 2009