27-08-2013, 11:49 AM
As I recall from the AGM, there were a large number of motions tabled regarding the constitution, including the "Proxy Issue". The scope of this was extended to also include input on any other aspects of the constitution that members may have.
Therefore a Working Party was being set up to examine these motions and make recommendations to Council. The council was then to review and publish these findings for comment and possible modification before then calling an EGM to formally publically discuss, re-tailor if necessary and then incorporate into the constitution before the next AGM.
But that's only my understanding............................
I agree the title of this thread is a bit misleading, perhaps it should be called "Constitutional Review"
Therefore a Working Party was being set up to examine these motions and make recommendations to Council. The council was then to review and publish these findings for comment and possible modification before then calling an EGM to formally publically discuss, re-tailor if necessary and then incorporate into the constitution before the next AGM.
But that's only my understanding............................
I agree the title of this thread is a bit misleading, perhaps it should be called "Constitutional Review"