17-12-2013, 05:56 PM
Andy Howie Wrote:Derek,I wasn't suggesting that it should be the sole means. It's just an additional means, and one of the best ways of directors interacting with members.
The problem with the forum is it is but a small part of the membership. That's why it should never be used as a sole means of communication.
Andy Howie Wrote:Yes I am blaming the infighting for a lot of the problems I am seeing at the moment. I am seeing the effect it is having on people who are quite frankly sick of it and ready to walk away. That is nothing to do with communication.
I accept what you and Andrew say about it being demoralising (been there). However I've tried to be positive post-AGM, (this thread was meant to be a positive one!) and I thought things had improved significantly (although obviously not completely), a few forum threads notwithstanding. If it is just as bad then things are a lot worse than are coming across.
Andy Howie Wrote:When Hamish publishes the names of who is on the committee are we going to see hand wringing from all sides about how it is blatantly unfair or why so and so is missed off or are we going to accept that these people are going to make the changes needed and support them.
I don't see that as being a "sides" issue. Surely it's something that doesn't involve that? I'm certainly not aware of different views when it comes to amending the Constitution. I would have thought nobody would have an issue as long as the best or most appropriate people were picked.
Andy Howie Wrote:I know what side I will be taking as change is both inevitable, needed and welcome! Maybe part of that change can cover Director communications laying down guidelines as you have suggested. It is not a bad idea at all!Agreed. =)