Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Continuation of AGM - motion 1.2
#37
In 1966 you could pretty much do anything and FIDE would accept it.

I did consider the problem of having a FIDE licenced arbiter at the 'venue' - and that IS now a requirement - but didn't raise it because the idea might still have legs for non-FIDE rated events.

Perhaps Steve can get FIDE to make exceptions.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)