05-01-2014, 09:39 AM
Good to see this thread returning to its original purpose. That is debate ahead of putting the issue out to committee. Yes, I am aware that I am assuming that motion 1.2 will be discussed and passed but I can't see any logical reason for rejection.
The debate on here should include input from all those who think that they can make an input. Great to see that Alex and Steve have combined forces to get some input from FIDE. An inspiration idea from left field. One that could easily be missed by a committee working in isolation.
More input though is needed. There are precious few CS members contributing and this is a matter than is likely to affect all active chess players in Scotland.
Bearing all that in mind I invite all notice board members who are not CS members to express their views. In doing so you will not be breaking any rules contained within either the Chess Scotland constitution or the rules of the notice board.
The debate on here should include input from all those who think that they can make an input. Great to see that Alex and Steve have combined forces to get some input from FIDE. An inspiration idea from left field. One that could easily be missed by a committee working in isolation.
More input though is needed. There are precious few CS members contributing and this is a matter than is likely to affect all active chess players in Scotland.
Bearing all that in mind I invite all notice board members who are not CS members to express their views. In doing so you will not be breaking any rules contained within either the Chess Scotland constitution or the rules of the notice board.