Poll: How should the Sensory Boards be funded
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
By Donation (individuals and congresses)
44.12%
15 44.12%
Increasing congress entry fees by £1 (going towards the costs)
23.53%
8 23.53%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £50
8.82%
3 8.82%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £75
2.94%
1 2.94%
Congresses using the boards paying an extra 5p per graded result
8.82%
3 8.82%
I do not think Chess Scotland should use such boards
11.76%
4 11.76%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sensory Boards
#27
Yeah, I'm actually lining up in favour of something like 4/2/2 (or 4/2/1/1, or something else, depending on how many sections there are and what the arbiter feels like). If we're asking everybody to pay (and I think we should be), this seems a reasonable way of spreading the benefits.

Come on David, even if someone isn't directly getting the benefit from it, it's going to work out at £6 a year, tops. Surely pretty much everybody has a decent enough chance of getting to play on the top boards of their section every now and again anyway.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)