Posts: 1,929
Threads: 263
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
5
andyburnett Wrote:One of the teams HAS to be Bon Accord surely? :-o 2 of your recent posts seem to be at cross-purposes Andy?!
Also, who are these arbiters we keep hearing about? If people are making decisions (Richardson argument/disagreement before the final, and now this decision-to-be-made) we should really be told who is deciding these things and have it all open and accountable.
I'm not trying to start an argument here, by the way. Honest! O:-)
Andy Burnett
Andy
It is the Arbiters Committee. Ken, Alex, Lara, Myself, Simon and Alasdair
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
Posts: 1,000
Threads: 94
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
2
The 2 CS nominations will be Bon Accord & Edinburgh.
No more new teams expressed an interest. EW had a better claim than Edinburgh but many of their strong regulars can't make it so Jonathan proposed fairer to allow Edinburgh the place.
Posts: 358
Threads: 79
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
Even if some of the stronger EW players couldn't take part I think this is a noble and gracious gesture by Jonathan. It removes at an early stage any possible uncertainty about which team accompanies BA and allows Edinburgh to start making arrangements without any delay.