21-08-2014, 03:46 PM
Let me clarify, before anyone gets too offended.
"£300 funding per player, you can spend this how you please."
That is what I have trouble coming to terms with.
Specifically the "you can spend this how you please."
Having previously assumed that people stated truths on here, I have to ask the question. Is that true?
If any part of Chess Scotland awards budget to players (directly or indirectly)for any event and states the purpose of that money e.g. "£xxx for travel and subsistence". Fine. That's the prerogative of those who are enabled to make those decisions. They know where the money has been spent.
Surely that's how it has to be?
You can't just give money to people and let them do what they want with it.
"£300 funding per player, you can spend this how you please."
That is what I have trouble coming to terms with.
Specifically the "you can spend this how you please."
Having previously assumed that people stated truths on here, I have to ask the question. Is that true?
If any part of Chess Scotland awards budget to players (directly or indirectly)for any event and states the purpose of that money e.g. "£xxx for travel and subsistence". Fine. That's the prerogative of those who are enabled to make those decisions. They know where the money has been spent.
Surely that's how it has to be?
You can't just give money to people and let them do what they want with it.