24-03-2022, 11:56 PM
This is not really my responsibility.
Hamish, I believe that is the wording but could not swear to it. Apparently this outcome was not publicised in time for the following Scottish Championships so may participants were unaware of the changes. I know there were complaints that those eligible for the title were not indicated on the charts but the charts did show those who were SCO so I did not (and do not still) accept that this was accurate. Charts in previous years had required additional identification as a number of non-SCO players had been eligible to win the title (eg Mark Orr due to residence).
Andy, Motion 1 I think is the status quo. However, it is being moved into the constitution where it requires a higher majority than the 50%+1 that it needs to amend it currently.
Hamish, I believe that is the wording but could not swear to it. Apparently this outcome was not publicised in time for the following Scottish Championships so may participants were unaware of the changes. I know there were complaints that those eligible for the title were not indicated on the charts but the charts did show those who were SCO so I did not (and do not still) accept that this was accurate. Charts in previous years had required additional identification as a number of non-SCO players had been eligible to win the title (eg Mark Orr due to residence).
Andy, Motion 1 I think is the status quo. However, it is being moved into the constitution where it requires a higher majority than the 50%+1 that it needs to amend it currently.