27-03-2022, 01:37 AM
Below I propose a minor amendment to Proposal 1 aimed at avoiding any governance issues and giving Council flexibility (note the word "may") in the unlikely event that something similar comes up in future. Needs a seconder.
Proposed Amendment To Proposal 1: add the following sentence to the end of current wording.
"Council may exceptionally approve (including retrospectively) or cancel the eligibility of a player not meeting these eligibility criteria, subject to a simple majority vote in favour by the general membership following a consultation period of at least 1 month."
If Proposal 1 as amended was approved, then the vote on Proposal 2 can proceed as planned if it is deemed that a 1 month consultation has already happened, or later if not.
If Proposal 1 is approved unamended, as previously mentioned I think Proposal 2 would be unconstitutional.
If Proposal 1 is not approved then I guess Proposal 2 can just proceed anyway.
I would still not vote for Proposal 2 without a reason, probably abstain.
Proposed Amendment To Proposal 1: add the following sentence to the end of current wording.
"Council may exceptionally approve (including retrospectively) or cancel the eligibility of a player not meeting these eligibility criteria, subject to a simple majority vote in favour by the general membership following a consultation period of at least 1 month."
If Proposal 1 as amended was approved, then the vote on Proposal 2 can proceed as planned if it is deemed that a 1 month consultation has already happened, or later if not.
If Proposal 1 is approved unamended, as previously mentioned I think Proposal 2 would be unconstitutional.
If Proposal 1 is not approved then I guess Proposal 2 can just proceed anyway.
I would still not vote for Proposal 2 without a reason, probably abstain.