25-01-2014, 12:26 PM
Iain Swan Wrote:Can anybody tell me how the draw was carried out?
I believe Andy did the draw with help from Craig Pritchett after they had finished their game in last round.
Richardson and Spens 2013-14
|
25-01-2014, 12:26 PM
Iain Swan Wrote:Can anybody tell me how the draw was carried out? I believe Andy did the draw with help from Craig Pritchett after they had finished their game in last round.
25-01-2014, 01:37 PM
Hamilton 5.5 –2.5 Edinburgh West
(B) Mannion S 1-0 Arakhamia-Grant K (W) Muir A 0.5 Pritchett C (B) Redpath J 1-0 Grant J (W) Coffey P 0.5 Farrell N (B) Tweedie S 0.5 Neave G (W) Jamieson P 0-1 Buchanan W (B) Nolan G 1-0 Bell A (W) Donohue T 1-0 McLean I Polytechnic Edinburgh b Colin McNab 2497 1 - 0 Clement Sreeves 2248 w John Shaw 2403 0.5 - 0.5 Neil Berry 2242 b Vitalij Samolins 2398 0.5 - 0.5 Calum MacQueen 2242 w Iain Swan 2145 0.5 - 0.5 Andrew Green 2170 b Larry Kirk 2090 0 - 1 David Oswald 2148 w Algirdas Tiuninas 2081 1 - 0 Hugh Brechin 2081 b Elaine Bamber 2064 1 - 0 Raj Bhopal 2028 w Joseff Thomas 2008 0 - 1 Graeme Kafka 2018 4.5 - 3.5
25-01-2014, 06:54 PM
Message from Andy Muir:
I can confirm semi-final draw was done by myself & Craig Pritchett I am staying off the noticeboard till March to give moderators a break CONSOLATION Oban 8-0 Dundee w/o SPENS Result for Irvine versus Kilmarnock B 3.5-2.5 (W)D Gillespie(17274) 1-0 J McNichol(5209) (B)G King(4507).5-.5 J Armour (3073) (W)R Copeland(16666) 1-0 C Strong (8401) (B)R Loughran(4725).5-.5 A Muir (5401) (W)R Gourlay(7499) 0-1 R Henderson (24787) (B)R Locke(4710) .5-.5 R McCormick(4985) ED CS 2.5 v Kilmarnock A 3.5 4810 A Prince (W) 1859 1-0 DEFAULT C Allor 3084 Crawford McNab 1805 0.5 5875 Joe Parks 1822 3084 Rudolph Austin 1720 0-1 7619 Kenny Malkin 1822 5921 Richard Scott 1571 0-1 4357 Steve Hilton 1822 4313 Douglas Heatlie 1563 0-1 4236 Douglas Hamilton 3143 Simon Bate 1552 1-0 4611 Jim Kleboe 1760 Tom Donohue W 1976 1 – 0 Chris James B 1811 James Montgomery B 1666 0 - 1 Richard Carter W 1736 Robert Mongomery W 1662 1 – 0 Jonathan Livingstone B 1656 James Drummond B 1216 ½ - ½ Frank Banaghan W 1600 (est) Bernard Airlie W 1160 ½ - ½ Alan Bell B 1399 Bill Perrie B 1108 0 - 1 Alice Banaghan W 1170 HAMILTON 3 - 3 DUNBAR * Hamilton won on board count. Phones Troon W Robert Dickson 1806 1- 0 John Calder 1880 B John McIntyre 1638 1/2 Robin Templeton 1837 W Paul MacDonald 1576 1- 0 Tommy Barrett 1832 B Robert O’Brien 1564 0 -1 Clive Baird 1734 W Colin Paterson 1466 0 -1 Duncan Malcolm 1618 B Ewan Trantor 1416 1/2 Alice Lampard 1582 Tie Break win Phones 3 - 3
25-01-2014, 09:43 PM
I've just become aware this topic has reawakened
I agree that information should be made available as soon as possible after an event/match. There are dedicated web pages for the Richardson and Spens on the CS website – from the home page menu select 'Chess Scotland', then 'CS Events'; then links to the main CS events. For your convenience the direct link is http://www.chessscotland.com/membership/...Events.htm These pages are maintained and updated by Dick Heathwood – but only if he is sent the data and that didn't happen recently. That is something for me to address. I will send the details posted here to Dick and I anticipate that he will update soon. Joe – thank you for posting the details above. In the absence – or in addition to – other forms of dissemination perhaps teams might use this forum to declare results? Jonathan - Quote:suggest results for these types of competitions should be covered in newspapers and on BBC ceefax (yes that still exists!) or chessresults.com– fair comment and a good idea. You seem to be a mine of good ideas (no, I'm not being facetious, I mean it). One thing this suggests to me is that CS could use a dedicated Press Officer for this and many other purposes. Quote:if the results were done on an a uniformed online form, rather than an email when people get round to it, and published for all to see.I'll look into how we might achieve this, though I tend to think that filling in an electronic form with all the detail of a Richardson match would be a bit tedious. An alternative would be to hand write a printed pro-forma result sheet (as we used to do), photograph or scan it and email to A.M., Dick and anyone else you want to inform. You are right about the website – it is work in progress, at an early stage and ways of developing still being considered. Some of the ideas in this thread are already being thought about. Quote:I can imagine the current Rich/Spens team are short on volunteers– I would like to expand that thought but I'll do that in a new topic in a day or two. Hamilton – Dunbar. Would someone from one or other of these teams be kind enough to post the details here please? Thanks. FYI Bon Accord - Castlehill will be played next Saturday, 1st Feb One other thing just now – the consolation event. I have emailed Richardson captains but am short of replies – is there enough interest to justify spending CS money on a trophy? I am getting some cool responses to it and there are alternatives to this concept. I would be grateful for views from anyone whose team might qualify, in future years if not this one. .
26-01-2014, 11:25 AM
Hi Keith, the Hamilton v Dunbar 3-3 result info is there on the above post.
Just a query out of general interest and for future reference in case the situation arises with our team regarding ED CS 2.5 v Kilmarnock A 3.5 also in the earlier results post above. Kilmarnock were a player short (their board 1) and dropped a point by default. However Edinburgh Civil Service didn't play their own board 1 and won the default there. Is that a fixed rule and how it has to happen? Or was that the player they just so happened to choose at their own discretion not to play and take the default? I would have thought the norm was for Board 6 typicaly not to play and win by default but with discretion allowed as to which player/board drops out and takes the default point.
26-01-2014, 12:34 PM
If they were expecting the player to come then defaulting board 1 was the correct thing to do. If they knew that he wasn't then they should have defaulted Board 6
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
26-01-2014, 02:57 PM
Jonathan - thanks, I saw the result but I meant the details of the players and individual scores. For grading as much as info.
26-01-2014, 03:30 PM
The board results are above the actual result, I just copied and pasted from e-mail. Would edit but the button does not seem to be there!
26-01-2014, 05:32 PM
Keith
From above Quote:Tom Donohue W 1976 1 – 0 Chris James B 1811
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
26-01-2014, 06:42 PM
Andy Howie Wrote:If they were expecting the player to come then defaulting board 1 was the correct thing to do. If they knew that he wasn't then they should have defaulted Board 6 Kilmarnock expected their board one to arrive. He did not so after an hour he lost by default. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|