Posts: 1,003
Threads: 101
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
1
I was wondering who I should contact with regard to applying for the Candidate Master title from FIDE?
I imagine as with other (better!) titles it has to be done through the national body?!
Thanks in advance,
Andy Burnett
Posts: 455
Threads: 46
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
5
The Candidate Master title is purely a vanity title introduced by Stewart Reuben. It has no value whatsoever to an event. I don't know what the Chess Scotland policy on these titles is (they pay for all others) but I would certainly vote against CS paying for these.
This is not personal but it really is as close to a meaningless title as you can get.
Posts: 1,929
Threads: 263
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
5
Alex McFarlane Wrote:The Candidate Master title is purely a vanity title introduced by Stewart Reuben. It has no value whatsoever to an event. I don't know what the Chess Scotland policy on these titles is (they pay for all others) but I would certainly vote against CS paying for these.
This is not personal but it really is as close to a meaningless title as you can get.
Alex,
Policy is CM and WCM are not paid for by CS
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
Posts: 152
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2011
Adam Bremner would also like to know how to apply for the CM title... given he will be applying for it next year when he loses our bet =).
Posts: 1,929
Threads: 263
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
5
andyburnett Wrote:Quote:The Candidate Master title is purely a vanity title introduced by Stewart Reuben. It has no value whatsoever to an event. I don't know what the Chess Scotland policy on these titles is (they pay for all others) but I would certainly vote against CS paying for these.
This is not personal but it really is as close to a meaningless title as you can get
I understand it's of no value to an event, but as far as I am concerned (and this is not persoanl ) it is far more meaningful than, for example, WFM. For that matter, isn't FM pretty meaningless nowadays as it only requires a rating rather than norms? 100 point difference isn't that huge
:\
In any event, it does get free membership for various chess sites - so, if I'm willing to pay for it, how do I go about applying for it (again, CS application?)? I seem to remember Paul Roberts getting his CM at the SNCL a year or 2 back, possibly Phil Giulian too (although I thought he was FM?!)
Not quite, FM and WFM can be used by organisors as titled players for norms, CM and WCM can't. FM and WFM are useful to us!
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"